![]() ![]() 2.1.2 Conflict of interestĬIHR makes every effort to ensure that its decisions are fair and objective by identifying and addressing any conflict of interest between an applicant and a reviewer. ![]() However, a list of review committee members is typically published on the CIHR website 60 days after the approval of funding of a competition. The identity of the reviewers will not be revealed to the applicants. Therefore, all written materials used in evaluating an application are made available to the applicants when they are notified of CIHR's funding decision for a competition. In turn, applicants are not to contact committee members, including the Chair and Scientific Officer, regarding the status of their applications (ratings, rank, etc.).īy law, applicants have access to their own application files. The use of this information for any other purpose is a breach of the Privacy Act and could result in a CIHR investigation and/or report to the federal Privacy Commissioner's Office.ĬIHR instructs committee members to not approach or communicate in any way with applicants, or anyone outside of the committee, any information relating to the review of a specific application, or offer opinions on the applicant’s chances of success or failure. The information provided by applicants in their applications is protected by the Privacy Act and is made available to external assessors for reviewing purposes only. Ensure that all review materials personally used are handled safely and disposed of according to the Guide on Handling Documents used in Peer Review.Ĭonfidentiality is information about a person that will not be disclosed directly or indirectly to anyone else without that person's prior expressed consent.Committee members must not divulge their contents to others, or use any information herein for any other purpose than peer review. Treat applications as protected information.Declare their conflicts of interest with applications.Abide by CIHR’s Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Policy of the Federal Research Funding Organizations.In addition, the CIHR review process is supported by a number of policies and guidelines which help to ensure the quality of the review system and the quality of the research that is funded through its research programs.Īll committee members (Chair, Scientific Officer, reviewers) must agree to: a strengthened Canadian health-care system.more effective health services and products and,.CIHR’s peer review process is supported by academic reviewers, as well as non-academic reviewers, including industry, government and community-based representatives.ĬIHR relies on peer review to ensure its mandate to excel, according to internationally accepted standards, in the creation of new knowledge and its translation into: ![]() CIHR’s peer review process involves the evaluation of applications by a group of reviewers, who have (individually or collectively) the required experience and/or expertise, as determined by CIHR, to assess the quality and/or potential impact of the proposed research and/or research related activities, within the context of the funding opportunity objectives. Peer Review refers to the process used by CIHR to review applications submitted for funding. support CIHR’s objectives and strategic funding targets.ensure fair and effective evaluation and,.The integrity of the review process for strategic programs relies on well-established principles and policies that: The purpose of these guidelines is to provide information regarding the review process for priority-driven initiatives.įor detailed regulations concerning all aspects of CIHR funding programs, please refer to the CIHR Funding policies. The goal of CIHR’s priority-driven initiatives is to advance health knowledge and its application in specific areas of research identified by CIHR in consultation with other government departments, partners and stakeholders, in order to improve health systems and/or improve health outcomes in these priority areas. 3.4 Sequence of steps at a committee meetingĬIHR provides funding to researchers for innovative and targeted research that responds to the changing health needs and priorities of Canadians across all aspects of health, including biomedical research, clinical research, health system research, health services, the health of populations, societal and cultural dimensions of health and environmental influences on health, and other research as required.3.3 Committee members roles and responsibilities (in person or teleconference).3.1 Selection of CIHR review committee members.Review guidelines – Priority-driven initiatives Table of contents
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |